The Salesforce Paradox: Why a Flurry of AI Deals Can't Shake the Stock's Slump
On paper, Salesforce is doing everything right. In the span of a few short news cycles, the enterprise software giant has announced a dizzying array of partnerships with the biggest names in artificial intelligence. First came an expanded deal with OpenAI. Then, a collaboration with Google to integrate its powerful Gemini models. They even brought Anthropic’s Claude into the fold. The press releases paint a picture of a company at the absolute bleeding edge, weaving generative AI into the very fabric of its customer relationship management empire.
You can almost picture the brief flicker of green on trading screens as headlines like Salesforce Stock (NYSE:CRM) Jumps on Bullish $60B Forecast and Google Gemini AI Partnership crossed the wire, a momentary sugar rush before the algorithms, or perhaps just sober second thought, kicked back in. Because despite this full-court press on AI, Salesforce stock (CRM) is telling a profoundly different story. The stock is down significantly for the year—to be more exact, 28% year-to-date as of the latest reports. After an initial pop on the news of its $60 billion revenue target for 2030, the share price settled, continuing its sluggish trend.
This creates a fascinating discrepancy. The narrative coming from CEO Marc Benioff’s camp is one of aggressive innovation and future-proofing. The numbers reflected in the stock chart, however, suggest deep-seated investor skepticism. The market seems to be looking at this avalanche of AI announcements and collectively asking a very simple, very pointed question: So what?
A Tale of Two Signals
To understand the disconnect, you have to separate the company’s strategic maneuvering from its financial reality. The strategy is clear and, frankly, logical. Salesforce is positioning its new Agentforce 360 platform as the central nervous system for enterprise AI. By partnering with OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic, it’s effectively becoming model-agnostic. The pitch is compelling: use our platform, and you can plug in whichever best-in-class AI model you prefer to do everything from querying sales records in ChatGPT to building Tableau visualizations on the fly. As OpenAI’s Sam Altman put it, it’s about making "the tools people use every day work better together." It’s a vision of seamless, intelligent workflows.
Alongside this, management has dangled a juicy long-term target: revenue exceeding $60 billion by 2030, a figure that edges out analyst consensus. This is the forward-looking signal, the promise of sustained growth and market leadership in the new AI era. They are, in essence, trying to change the narrative from that of a maturing software giant to a re-accelerating AI powerhouse.
But the market is a discounting mechanism, and it’s currently applying a heavy discount to that narrative. Why? Because the second signal—the company's current financial profile—is flashing caution. Let’s be clinical about this. Salesforce’s revenue growth has been decelerating. Its three-year compound annual growth rate of 10.5% is respectable, but its most recent quarterly growth was 9.8%. This isn't a crisis, but it's the natural trajectory of a massive, $40 billion revenue company maturing. The days of explosive 30%+ growth are in the rearview mirror.
This is where I find the current situation genuinely puzzling. The market is being asked to pay a premium for a company exhibiting slowing growth, based on a promise of future AI monetization that remains entirely unproven. Salesforce’s strategy feels like a restaurant owner loudly announcing they’ve started sourcing ingredients from the world’s most famous farms. It’s an interesting development, but it doesn’t tell you anything about the quality of the new menu, the price of the dishes, or whether customers will actually pay more for them. What is the tangible, line-item revenue that comes from integrating Gemini into Slack? How does an OpenAI partnership translate into a higher subscription fee that customers will absorb without churning? These are the questions the press releases don't answer.
The company's valuation amplifies these concerns. Salesforce trades at a Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 36.0x, a steep premium over the S&P 500’s 24.0x. Its Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio is nearly double the market average (6.1x vs. 3.3x). These aren't the multiples of a company grinding out high single-digit growth; they are the multiples of a company priced for a significant re-acceleration that has yet to materialize. The only metric where it trades in line with the market is its Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow, a testament to its operational efficiency but not necessarily its growth prospects.
Investors who have been burned before are right to be cautious. This is a stock with high beta characteristics. During the 2022 inflation shock, CRM fell 58.6% compared to the S&P 500’s 25.4% decline. It has a history of amplifying market downturns. The pending $8 billion acquisition of Informatica adds another layer of complexity and execution risk. All this, combined with the distraction of CEO Marc Benioff's political commentary—calling for National Guard intervention in San Francisco one minute and pledging billions to make it the "World's AI Capital" the next—paints a picture of a company with a slightly scattered focus.
The core issue is that these AI partnerships, while necessary for staying competitive, may be viewed by the market as defensive, not offensive. In today's environment, not having an integration with OpenAI or Google would be a major red flag. So, Salesforce is making the moves it has to make. But is it creating a durable competitive moat, or is it simply paying a toll to use someone else's foundational technology? Is Salesforce building the future, or is it becoming a very sophisticated (and expensive) distributor for the real AI innovators?
The Monetization Question Remains Unanswered
Ultimately, the market isn't pricing Salesforce based on its headlines but on its future cash flows. The current standoff between the company's ambitious AI narrative and its stagnant stock price boils down to one thing: monetization. The flurry of deals has successfully answered the question of technological capability. Yes, Salesforce will have access to cutting-edge AI. But it has left the far more important financial question completely open. Until there is a clear, quantifiable line of sight from "Gemini integration" to "new, high-margin revenue stream," investors will likely treat these announcements as table stakes, not a royal flush. The burden of proof is now entirely on Salesforce to show that this AI blitz is more than just good PR. It has to be good business.
Tags: crm stock